Building custom courses using an outside developer |
Cost: high.
|
Risk: low, in terms of the greater likelihood of getting well-designed
courses, created by outside professionals.
|
Effort: low (no need to retrain your own staff).
|
In addition to online courses,
many organizations including IBM, Ernst & Young and Verizon Communications,
use a "blended" approach, combining online courses with classroom-based
activities.
|
|
6.0 ROI- Return On Investment |
The use of a business case
to justify any significant investment is common practice in both
industry and government and its use in investment decision making
for eLearning is no exception. Its primary focus is a cost-benefit
analysis. A thorough analysis includes a comprehensive investigation
of all eLearning costs as well as a realistic projection of benefits
such as Return On Investment (ROI).
|
The costs incurred for an
organization establishing an eLearning program can be significant.
Course conversion costs for existing classroom-based courses are
about Rs. 40,000 and up for a two-hour course, depending on the
kind of interaction needed. A new course of similar length costs
more than Rs. 80,000 to develop. Course conversion and development
can be accomplished by hiring an instructional designer and a producer
or outsourcing to a company specializing in this work. If you are
able to take advantage of off-the-shelf courses, the cost is much
more reasonable ranging from just a few thousands to Rs. 15,000.
|
Another major eLearning cost
is the purchase of a Learning Management System (LMS) which manages
the launching, assessment and record keeping of the eLearning solution.
LMS costs range from few Lac rupees to couple of crores, depending
on the functionality desired. Additionally, there are other costs
that must be considered and which are often overlooked such as the
costs of activities to help prepare employees for eLearning through
hands-on training, marketing and public relations.
|
On the benefit side of the
ledger there are well-documented cost savings (ROI) associated with
eLearning. These savings include reduced costs for travel, facilities
and instructors. For example, Cisco estimated it saved $2.4 million
during its first year of eLearning for every 1,000 e-learners.
|
eLearning also enables cost
savings through efficiency, reduced training time and enhanced productivity.
Material presented via eLearning takes approximately 50 percent
less time than classroom-style presentation. Any number of learners
can receive instruction at the same time, therefore reducing the
amount of training time. Finally, eLearning minimizes employee time
away from the job thus limiting employee productivity loss.
|
|
|
While cost savings (ROI)
alone may be sufficient to justify an eLearning investment, some
companies are focusing on enhanced employee job performance as a
rationale for eLearning. Even though it is difficult to assess a
one-to-one correlation of learning experience to performance, companies
such as Shell have moved in this direction by incorporating learning
in all its business unit scorecards. Ernst & Young learners and
supervisors use Web-based surveys to help assess performance change
and on-the-job knowledge and skill application. Cisco has reported
increased employee productivity attributable to eLearning such as
improved efficiencies in using business tools, quicker implementation
of tools to a broader scope of employees, and increased workloads
while requiring fewer people.
|
Other forward-looking companies
have started ambitious measurement programs to prove eLearning's
positive impact on business results. Gartner Group estimates that
about 30 percent of its eLearning clients use metrics to chart eLearning
impact on company performance. Some of these metrics include reduced
time-to-market for new products, improved customer retention and
repeat business rates, and increased revenue or market share. As
an example of the latter, KPMG Consulting has stated that recent
revenue increases in e-commerce and e-business consulting reflect
eLearning contribution to the bottom line. Gartner Group estimates
that KPMG booked $1 billion in e-business consulting revenue following
its eLearning rollout.
|
Regardless of whether hard
financial figures documenting cost savings are used or more intangible
benefits such as improved organizational performance, companies
throughout industry, as well as government agencies, have been able
to prepare strong business cases for eLearning. eLearning has matured
to the point that it is able to withstand the scrutiny of a disciplined
business case analysis to clearly demonstrate value to any organization.
|
Turning to the cost side
of the equation, eLearning offers several advantages over classroom
training. You need to take into account the following factors:
|
The cost per person for the training is likely to be considerably
lower
|
Tremendous cost savings. As much as 40 cents of every rupee spent
on in-person corporate learning is eaten up by travel and lodging
costs. Brandon Hall, a well-recognized industry expert, believes
that companies can experience a 40-60% cost savings when comparing
instructor-led courses with technology-delivered courses.
|
The productivity lost from being away from the job is likely to
be considerably lower, particularly if employees are willing to
train outside normal work hours.
|
The training time may also be less, given the ability to take
just the required training modules (or "opting out" by showing competency
in a pre-test) rather than having to attend an entire course. This
decreases employee time-to-productivity/time-to-competency.
|
|